Hybrid missions: A promising model resolving the global-regional debate

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There has always been a dilemma whether the United Nations (UN) or regional organisations are better suited to preserve peace and help former parties to reconcile after conflicts. The demand for legitimacy, efficiency and impartiality has driven the preference towards the UN - a global organisation with a strong 60 years record of peacekeeping. Regional organisations have been seen as less equipped but also as probably less unbiased when it comes to peacekeeping. However, the UN peace operations have also incurred shortages, and some recent failures - Darfur and the Democratic Republic of the Congo among the others - re-activated the debates how to engage regional organisations closely.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Popovski, V., & Fath-Lihic, A. (2012). Hybrid missions: A promising model resolving the global-regional debate. In The United Nations and the Regions: Third World Report on Regional Integration (pp. 149–155). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2751-9_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free