The Securitization of Humanitarian Aid: A Case Study of the Dadaab Refugee Camp in Kenya

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The delivery of humanitarian assistance has always been a risky business. Now more than ever, there are more humanitarian organizations delivering aid in high-risk environments like refugee camps and war-torn regions. Within this operating environment, humanitarian principles such as neutrality, impartiality, and humanity have often failed to protect aid workers from violent attacks as they increasingly venture into a world inhabited by “surplus populations.” As a result, security is now embedded in the conceptualization, planning, and delivery of humanitarian aid. Paradoxically, there is an enduring tension between humanitarianism and security especially at the operational level. This tension leaves frontline humanitarian workers exposed to the same elements of insecurity that persistently threaten the lives of those they endeavor to help. This contribution investigates how the securitization of humanitarian aid plays out in the Dadaab camp complex and how this affects aid delivery including the humanitarian community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kimathi, L. (2019). The Securitization of Humanitarian Aid: A Case Study of the Dadaab Refugee Camp in Kenya. In Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development (pp. 65–80). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03721-5_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free