The price of approximate stability for scheduling selfish tasks on two links

5Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We consider a scheduling game, where a set of selfish agents (traffic loads) want to be routed in exactly one of the two parallel links of a system. Every agent aims to minimize her own completion time, while the social objective is the makespan, i.e. the time at which the last agent finishes her execution. We study the problem of optimizing the makespan under the constraint that the obtained schedule is a (pure) Nash equilibrium, i.e. a schedule in which no agent has incentive to unilaterally change her strategy (link). We consider a relaxation of the notion of equilibrium by considering α-approximate Nash equilibria where an agent does not have sufficient incentive (w.r.t. the value of α) to unilaterally change her strategy. Our main contribution is the study of the tradeoff between the approximation ratio for the makespan and the value of α. We first give an algorithm which provides a solution with an approximation ratio of 8/7 for the makespan and which is a 3-approximate Nash equilibrium, provided that the local policy of each link is Longest Processing Time (LPT). Furthermore, we show that a slight modification of the classical Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (PTAS) of Graham allows to obtain a schedule whose makespan is arbitrarily close to the optimum while keeping a constant value for α. Finally, we give bounds establishing relations between the value of α and the best possible value of the approximation ratio, provided that the local policies of the links are LPT. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Angel, E., Bampis, E., & Pascual, F. (2006). The price of approximate stability for scheduling selfish tasks on two links. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4128 LNCS, pp. 157–166). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11823285_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free