An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires

111Citations
Citations of this article
250Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Objective: This review is an update of a previous review published in 2010, and aims to summarize the available studies on the measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires for young people under the age of 18 years. Methods: Systematic literature searches were carried out using the online PubMed, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus databases up to 2018. Articles had to evaluate at least one of the measurement properties of a questionnaire measuring at least the duration or frequency of children’s physical activity, and be published in the English language. The standardized COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used for the quality assessment of the studies. Results: This review yielded 87 articles on 89 different questionnaires. Within the 87 articles, 162 studies were conducted: 103 studies assessed construct validity, 50 assessed test–retest reliability, and nine assessed measurement error. Of these studies, 38% were of poor methodological quality and 49% of fair methodological quality. A questionnaire with acceptable validity was found only for adolescents, i.e., the Greek version of the 3-Day Physical Activity Record. Questionnaires with acceptable test–retest reliability were found in all age categories, i.e., preschoolers, children, and adolescents. Conclusion: Unfortunately, no questionnaires were identified with conclusive evidence for both acceptable validity and reliability, partly due to the low methodological quality of the studies. This evidence is urgently needed, as current research and practice are using physical activity questionnaires of unknown validity and reliability. Therefore, recommendations for high-quality studies on measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires were formulated in the discussion. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42016038695.

References Powered by Scopus

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

7762Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth

3365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes

3132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants

2077Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Longitudinal changes in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

271Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physical activity, screen viewing time, and overweight/obesity among Chinese children and adolescents: An update from the 2017 physical activity and fitness in China - The youth study

168Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hidding, L. M., Chinapaw, M. J. M., van Poppel, M. N. M., Mokkink, L. B., & Altenburg, T. M. (2018, December 1). An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires. Sports Medicine. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0987-0

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 79

62%

Researcher 27

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 41

41%

Medicine and Dentistry 28

28%

Nursing and Health Professions 21

21%

Social Sciences 10

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free