Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in clinical practice: a feasible alternative for patients with good performance status

8Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Our aim was to assess efficacy and safety and prognostic factors associated with TAS-102 in clinical practice. Method: Retrospective, multicenter, and observational study including patients with advanced refractory colorectal cancer who started TAS-102 between March 2016 and August 2018. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival, toxicity and analyze prognostic factors present at the beginning of TAS-102. Result: 84 patients were evaluable. The median OS was 8.30 (95% CI 6.23–9.87) months and PFS was 2.62 (95% CI 2.36–3.05) months. In multivariate analysis, ECOG 0 and reduced dose combined with more cycles were associated with better prognosis. Patients with an ECOG > 0 had worse prognosis (HR 3.34, 95% CI 1.09–10.27, p = 0.035). 95.2% experienced some type of adverse effect and 45.2% had grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Conclusion: Results suggest reconsidering TAS-102 in patients with ECOG > 0, something that should be investigated in prospective randomized clinical trials.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carriles, C., Jimenez-Fonseca, P., Sánchez-Cánovas, M., Pimentel, P., Carmona-Bayonas, A., García, T., … Lozano-Blázquez, A. (2019). Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in clinical practice: a feasible alternative for patients with good performance status. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 21(12), 1781–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02154-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free