Linguistic Contradiction: Power and Politeness in Courtroom Discourse

  • Sanderson L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines the courtroom as a workplace using Brown and Levinson's politeness model. It is argued that while the model is a valuable tool for analyzing courtroom discourse, the courtroom, as well as institutional and organizational contexts in general, possesses characteristics that demand a more complex contextual analysis. The article first looks at some ef the distinct characteristics ef language use in a courtroom setting, and then analyzes excerpts drawn from a courtroom transcript. Institutional factors that affect the model's petformance in this workplace are delineated. The article concludes that these institutional factors are not unique to the courtroom; they are relevant to understanding language use in many types ef workplace, including corporate, public, and organizational contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanderson, L. (1995). Linguistic Contradiction: Power and Politeness in Courtroom Discourse. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 12(2), 24-Jan. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.397

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free