Effects of fixed versus variable task prioritization during short-term dual task practice on motor and cognitive task performance in young adults

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: It has been shown that variable compared to fixed task prioritization during dual task practice more effectively improves motor (i.e., postural control) and cognitive (i.e., memory) performance in older adults. However, it is unclear whether this finding is also valid in young adults. Thus, the present study examined the effect of fixed (allocate equal priority on both tasks) versus variable (vary priority between both tasks) priority during short-term motor-cognitive dual task practice on single and dual task performance in healthy young adults (age range: 20–30 years). Results: During two days of practice, significant improvements of motor (i.e., balance task: reduced root mean square error; p < 001, ηp2 =.72) and cognitive (i.e., arithmetic task: increased serial three subtractions; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muehlbauer, T., Voigt, H., Brueckner, D., & Beurskens, R. (2022). Effects of fixed versus variable task prioritization during short-term dual task practice on motor and cognitive task performance in young adults. BMC Research Notes, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06034-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free