Predictive vs. Structural Modeling: PLS vs. ML

  • Lohmöller J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
312Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Latent Variables Path (LVP) model and also the first viable estimation technique were developed by Karl Jöreskog (from 1973 onwards). Right from the beginning his LISREL method was of the utmost elegance and perfection, as regards the deductive properties of the model. The LISREL program has since been gradually improved (LISREL III: Jöreskog & van Thillo 1973; LISREL VII: Jöreskog & Sörbom 1987), as regards convenience for the user, additional estimation criteria and model diagnostics. However, one inconvenient side of LISREL, well known to all users, is incurable: LISREL tends to produce improper solutions characterized by negative variance estimates and LV correlations greater than unity (van Driel 1978, Jöreskog 1981, Fornell & Bookstein 1982, Rindskopf 1983, 1984).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Predictive vs. Structural Modeling: PLS vs. ML. In Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares (pp. 199–226). Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free