Self-citation in archaeology: Age, gender, prestige, and the self

39Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Citation analyses in archaeology have detected prestige tactics, shifts in research agendas, and patterns of gender differentiation. This paper focuses on self-citation in archaeology and systematically analyzes the factors that affect rates of self-citation. Self-citation rates in archaeology are significantly higher than in socio-cultural anthropology but are average for a social science with interdisciplinary ties to the physical sciences. Self-citation correlates weakly with the gender of the citing author and the geographic and thematic focus of research, but correlates strongly with the age of the author. Additional analyses reveal partial evidence for the use of self-citation as a prestige tactic. The paper concludes with a discussion of citations to writers close to the author (mentors, friends). © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hutson, S. R. (2006). Self-citation in archaeology: Age, gender, prestige, and the self. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-006-9001-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free