Perceived usefulness of word-of-mouth: An analysis of sentimentality in product reviews

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

People may regard some word-of-mouths (WOMs) as more useful than others. Review valance, emotion, and concreteness are the antecedents which may influence people’s perceived usefulness of the WOMs. This study collected online customer reviews from Amazon.com and conduct regression analysis and Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis to analyse the data. The findings revealed that negativity bias does exist, with negative reviews deemed as more useful than positive reviews. Besides, the research also revealed that online customer reviews with more positive emotion expression are perceived as less useful. However, online customer reviews with more negative emotion expression are perceived more useful. In addition, online customer reviews with longer review length are perceived as more useful than shorter online customer reviews.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, C. C., Li, M. Z., & Yang, Y. Y. H. (2015). Perceived usefulness of word-of-mouth: An analysis of sentimentality in product reviews. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 540, pp. 448–459). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48319-0_37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free