Candidates registered for reasonable adjustments underperform compared to other candidates in the national undergraduate Prescribing Safety Assessment: Retrospective cohort analysis (2014–2018)

3Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: Candidates with disabilities are eligible for reasonable adjustments (RA) while undertaking the national Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA). The PSA is a novel open-book, time-constrained, multiformat assessment that may pose challenges to candidates with dyslexia and other disabilities. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of 36 140 UK candidates undertaking first-sitting of the PSA (2014–2018). Results: Of the 36 140 candidates, 9.1% (3284) were registered for RA. The RA group had lower pass rates (absolute difference 1.94%, 95% confidence interval 1.01–2.87%; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hutchinson, K., Ricketts, W. M., Maxwell, S., & Ng, F. L. (2021). Candidates registered for reasonable adjustments underperform compared to other candidates in the national undergraduate Prescribing Safety Assessment: Retrospective cohort analysis (2014–2018). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 87(3), 946–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free