Improving the validity of conjoint analysis by additional data collection and analysis steps

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Depending on the concrete application field and the data collection situation, conjoint experiments can end up with a low internal validity of the estimated part-worth functions. One of the known reasons for this is the (missing) temporal stability and structural reliability of the respondents' part-worth functions, another reason is the (missing) attentiveness of the respondents in an uncontrolled data collection environment, e.g. during an online interview with many parallel web applications (e.g. electronic mail, newspapers or web site browsing). Here, additional data collection and analysis has been proposed as a solution. Examples of internal sources of data are response latencies, eye movements, or mouse movements, examples of external sources are sales and market data. The authors suggest alternative procedures for conjoint data collection that deal with these potential sources of internal validity. A comparison in an adaptive conjoint analysis setting shows, that the new procedures lead to a higher internal validity. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Selka, S., Baier, D., & Brusch, M. (2012). Improving the validity of conjoint analysis by additional data collection and analysis steps. In Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization (pp. 529–536). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24466-7_54

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free