Clinical performance of Rochette bridges used as immediate provisional restorations for single unit implants in general practice

6Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A retrospective clinical audit of the role and survival of 69 Rochette bridges used as immediate provisional restorations for single tooth, implant-retained crowns was carried out over the period between February 1991 and May 2001. In each case the extracted tooth was immediately temporised using a Rochette bridge with a single wing and pontic and cemented to the abutment tooth without any tooth preparation (Phase I). This bridge was removed at the time of implant placement and recemented (Phase II). At the im plant exposure stage the bridge was removed and discarded. In Phase I, 15.9% of the bridges required recementation and 27.5% of the bridges required recementations in phase 2; 7.2% of the bridges required recementations in both phases. An 80% probability of survival was noted after an interval of 200 days for phase I and a 78% probability of survival over the same time interval was observed for Phase II. A significant debond rate was observed when the retainer was a canine in comparison to the other bridges in Phase I. In Phase I the spring cantilever debond rate was significantly higher than that observed on the other bridges. More debondings were observed in males (25.8%) compared with females (7.9%) in phase I. More debondings were noted in the maxilla than in the mandible in Phase II. The performance characteristics of the metal acrylic Rochette bridge observed in this report supports the conclusion that this type of restoration is an effective means of immediate temporisation for patients undergoing single tooth implant retained restorations. © British Dental Journal 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Banerji, S., Sethi, A., Dunne, S. M., & Millar, B. J. (2005). Clinical performance of Rochette bridges used as immediate provisional restorations for single unit implants in general practice. British Dental Journal, 199(12), 771–775. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free