General Equilibrium Effects of Cash Transfers: Experimental Evidence From Kenya

  • Egger D
  • Haushofer J
  • Miguel E
  • et al.
45Citations
Citations of this article
249Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

How large economic stimuli generate individual and aggregate responses is a central question in economics, but has not been studied experimentally. We provided one‐time cash transfers of about USD 1000 to over 10,500 poor households across 653 randomized villages in rural Kenya. The implied fiscal shock was over 15 percent of local GDP. We find large impacts on consumption and assets for recipients. Importantly, we document large positive spillovers on non‐recipient households and firms, and minimal price inflation. We estimate a local transfer multiplier of 2.5. We interpret welfare implications through the lens of a simple household optimization framework.

References Powered by Scopus

Increasing returns and economic geography

6566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour

5591Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India

2579Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

General Equilibrium Effects of Cash Transfers: Experimental Evidence From Kenya

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving the consumer welfare of rural residents through public support policies: A study on old revolutionary areas in China

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effects of cash transfers on adult and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Egger, D., Haushofer, J., Miguel, E., Niehaus, P., & Walker, M. (2022). General Equilibrium Effects of Cash Transfers: Experimental Evidence From Kenya. Econometrica, 90(6), 2603–2643. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta17945

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 67

56%

Researcher 29

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 97

76%

Social Sciences 21

16%

Engineering 5

4%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 16

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free