Calibration of a Heterogeneous Brain Model Using a Subject-Specific Inverse Finite Element Approach

21Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Central to the investigation of the biomechanics of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the assessment of injury risk from head impact are finite element (FE) models of the human brain. However, many existing FE human brain models have been developed with simplified representations of the parenchyma, which may limit their applicability as an injury prediction tool. Recent advances in neuroimaging techniques and brain biomechanics provide new and necessary experimental data that can improve the biofidelity of FE brain models. In this study, the CAB-20MSym template model was developed, calibrated, and extensively verified. To implement material heterogeneity, a magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) template image was leveraged to define the relative stiffness gradient of the brain model. A multi-stage inverse FE (iFE) approach was used to calibrate the material parameters that defined the underlying non-linear deviatoric response by minimizing the error between model-predicted brain displacements and experimental displacement data. This process involved calibrating the infinitesimal shear modulus of the material using low-severity, low-deformation impact cases and the material non-linearity using high-severity, high-deformation cases from a dataset of in situ brain displacements obtained from cadaveric specimens. To minimize the geometric discrepancy between the FE models used in the iFE calibration and the cadaveric specimens from which the experimental data were obtained, subject-specific models of these cadaveric brain specimens were developed and used in the calibration process. Finally, the calibrated material parameters were extensively verified using independent brain displacement data from 33 rotational head impacts, spanning multiple loading directions (sagittal, coronal, axial), magnitudes (20–40 rad/s), durations (30–60 ms), and severity. Overall, the heterogeneous CAB-20MSym template model demonstrated good biofidelity with a mean overall CORA score of 0.63 ± 0.06 when compared to in situ brain displacement data. Strains predicted by the calibrated model under non-injurious rotational impacts in human volunteers (N = 6) also demonstrated similar biofidelity compared to in vivo measurements obtained from tagged magnetic resonance imaging studies. In addition to serving as an anatomically accurate model for further investigations of TBI biomechanics, the MRE-based framework for implementing material heterogeneity could serve as a foundation for incorporating subject-specific material properties in future models.

References Powered by Scopus

Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain

3838Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension

518Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation

500Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of Brain Biomechanical Models for Monitoring Impact Exposure in Contact Sports

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MR Imaging of Human Brain Mechanics In Vivo: New Measurements to Facilitate the Development of Computational Models of Brain Injury

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward a Comprehensive Delineation of White Matter Tract-Related Deformation

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giudice, J. S., Alshareef, A., Wu, T., Knutsen, A. K., Hiscox, L. V., Johnson, C. L., & Panzer, M. B. (2021). Calibration of a Heterogeneous Brain Model Using a Subject-Specific Inverse Finite Element Approach. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.664268

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

24%

Researcher 3

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 10

71%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

14%

Energy 1

7%

Neuroscience 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free