Fideism, Scepticism, or Free-Thought? The Dispute Between Lamy and Saint-Laurens over Metaphysical Knowledge

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

From 1708 to 1710, the Cartesian monk François Lamy exchanged several letters with a reader of his work on the value and possibility of knowledge. The young Saint-Laurens teased Lamy on several issues related to what we can know of God, of justice and morality, and of metaphysics, thus progressively revealing surprising aspects of his thought. Was Saint-Laurens a sceptic, a fideist, or a free-thinker? By exploring the main arguments exchanged in this recently published correspondence, this paper ultimately shows the impotence of seventeenth-century rationalism when put on the trial of the new sceptical and libertine trends.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malinowski-Charles, S. (2013). Fideism, Scepticism, or Free-Thought? The Dispute Between Lamy and Saint-Laurens over Metaphysical Knowledge. In International Archives of the History of Ideas/Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idees (Vol. 210, pp. 31–43). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free