Adaptability of structured forms for CSII initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes the Getting2GoalSM concept

3Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The goal is to assess the usability and satisfaction of implementing the Getting2GoalSM protocol by physicians transitioning patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from multiple daily injections (MDI) to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Methods: T2DM patients from three diabetes clinics were switched from MDI to CSII. Physicians used the Getting2Goal type 2 pumping protocol to prescribe and manage insulin pump therapy for T2DM. Surveys were conducted in which the physicians rated their feedback related to acceptability of the Getting2Goal on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: 17 patients with T2DM were switched from MDI to CSII treatment. Mean (±standard deviation) age was 61.2 ± 7.7 (46–77) years, weight was 91.4 ± 21 (66–147) kg, BMI was 31.9 ± 7.6, A1C was 9.2 ± 1.4 % (7.2–12.3) and TDD on MDI was 109.1 ± 53.1 units. Surveys completed by physicians indicated Getting2Goal type 2 pumping protocol to be more efficient, time saving, and structured compared to their current processes. In addition, the primarily prescribed TDD on pump was 98.1 ± 50.0 units and the TDD at first download was 81.4 ± 36.4 units, representing a 25.4 % reduction in TDD At first download. The percentage of all blood glucose readings below 70 mg/dL was also very low. Conclusions: The data indicate Getting2Goal materials as a standard approach that is simple and efficient to initiate pump therapy for T2DM. At the same time, it is safe and a useful tool for physicians that are starting to prescribe pump therapy for T2DM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, O., Agabria, Z., Lysyy, L., Ianovitsky, Y., Nguyen, X., Fung, M., … Wainstein, J. (2016). Adaptability of structured forms for CSII initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes the Getting2GoalSM concept. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 39(6), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-015-0407-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free