“We Do What We're Told”: How Current Assistant Principals Practice Leadership and how They Wish They Could

  • Militello M
  • Fusarelli B
  • Mattingly A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this Q-methodology study was to develop an understanding of the perceptions of assistant principals of their current and idealized leadership practices. Fifty-six current assistant principals sorted a set of leadership behaviors two times—first based on dispositions currently deployed in their practice and a second time based on dispositions that they wish to employ. The Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning empirically developed the sorted statements. Three model factor arrays were derived from each sort. The findings indicate a unique perspective between current and idealized practices for assistant principals. Moreover the dispositions geared toward second-order change did not appear in the positive side of the distribution on both the current and the idealized arrays.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Militello, M., Fusarelli, B. C., Mattingly, A., & Warren, T. (2015). “We Do What We’re Told”: How Current Assistant Principals Practice Leadership and how They Wish They Could. Journal of School Leadership, 25(2), 194–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500201

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free