Hybrid dual attack on LWE with arbitrary secrets

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the hybrid dual attack over learning with errors (LWE) problems for any secret distribution. Prior to our work, hybrid attacks are only considered for sparse and/or small secrets. A new and interesting result from our analysis shows that for most cryptographic use cases a hybrid dual attack outperforms a standalone dual attack, regardless of the secret distribution. We formulate our results into a framework of predicting the performance of the hybrid dual attacks. We also present a few tricks that further improve our attack. To illustrate the effectiveness of our result, we re-evaluate the security of all LWE related proposals in round 3 of NIST’s post-quantum cryptography process, and improve the state-of-the-art cryptanalysis results by 2-15 bits, under the BKZ-core-SVP model.

References Powered by Scopus

Fully Homomorphic Encryption Using Ideal Lattices

4682Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography

1494Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

NTRU: A ring-based public key cryptosystem

1365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Learning with Errors: A Lattice-Based Keystone of Post-Quantum Cryptography

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improved Hybrid Attack via Error-Splitting Method for Finding Quinary Short Lattice Vectors

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum-Resistant Encryption for Secure End-to-End Communication

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bi, L., Lu, X., Luo, J., Wang, K., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Hybrid dual attack on LWE with arbitrary secrets. Cybersecurity, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-022-00115-y

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘2500.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

67%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0