Purpose: Being acquainted with both lean and action learning in theory and in practice, this study finds that the theoretical complementarity of these two research streams has traditionally been underexploited. In this conceptual paper, this study aims to advance the theoretical understanding of lean by exploring the complementarity of lean thinking and action learning leading to a proposed integrated theory of these two research streams. Target audience is the operations management research community. Design/methodology/approach: By deliberately adopting a process of theorising, this paper explores, reflects upon and combines individual experiences of researching, teaching and engaging in lean and action learning as operations management scholars. Findings: Having taken a gemba walk through the literature and practices of lean and action learning, this study views and notices a systematic and complementary relationship between the two domains. The overlapping theoretical and practical complementarities of lean and action learning suggest that these two research streams are ripe for synthesis into an integrated theory. This finding provides an opportunity to (1) progress towards an integrative design of interventions leading to more sustainable lean system adoptions and (2) add new depth to our theoretical explanation of the success and failures of lean system adoptions. Originality/value: This paper contributes an original integrated theory perspective on lean and action learning.
CITATION STYLE
Saabye, H., Powell, D. J., & Coughlan, P. (2022). Lean and action learning: towards an integrated theory? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 43(13), 128–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2022-0371
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.