Beyond idealism and realism: Canadian NGO/government relations during the negotiation of the FCTC

26Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) marks a unique point in the history of global health governance. This convention produced the first legally binding treaty under the auspices of the World Health Organization. Another first was the extent to which non-governmental organizations (NGOs) participated in the negotiation process. This article explores the relationship between one group of NGOs and their respective government during the negotiation of the FCTC. Documentary analyses and 18 individual in-depth interviews were conducted with both government and NGO representatives. In contrast to the polar perspectives of idealism (NGOs as unique and autonomous) and realism (NGOs as funded arms of the government), our findings suggest that neither opposition nor conformity on the part of the NGOs characterize the relationship between the NGOs and government. While specific to the case under study (the FCTC), our findings nonetheless indicate the need for a nuanced view of the relationship between governments and NGOs, at least during the process of multilateral health policy negotiations. © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lencucha, R., Labonté, R., & Rouse, M. J. (2010). Beyond idealism and realism: Canadian NGO/government relations during the negotiation of the FCTC. Journal of Public Health Policy, 31(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2009.48

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free