Methodological issues on 'challenges and opportunities towards the road of universal health coverage (UHC) in Nepal: A systematic review'

3Citations
Citations of this article
136Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Challenges and opportunities towards the road of universal health coverage (UHC) in Nepal: a systematic review' is a policy review paper and we published in BMC - Archives of Public Health. Policy research is the process of conducting research, analysis of, a fundamental social problem in order to provide policymakers with pragmatic, action-oriented recommendations for alleviating the problem. The objective of this paper is to illustrate some methodological issues used in that paper.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration

5191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers

2241Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews

684Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Status and determinants of enrollment and dropout of health insurance in Nepal: An explorative study

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Universal Access to Advanced Imaging and Healthcare Protection: UHC and Diagnostic Imaging

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community-Based Health Insurance Utilization and Its Associated Factors among Rural Households in Akaki District, Oromia, Ethiopia, 2021

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ranabhat, C. L., & Acharya, D. (2020). Methodological issues on “challenges and opportunities towards the road of universal health coverage (UHC) in Nepal: A systematic review.” Archives of Public Health, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00418-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

77%

Researcher 7

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 24

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 14

29%

Social Sciences 6

13%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 157

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free