A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences

561Citations
Citations of this article
441Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A statistical method was developed for reconstructing the nucleotide or amino acid sequences of extinct ancestors, given the phylogeny and sequences of the extant species. A model of nucleotide or amino acid substitution was employed to analyze data of the present-day sequences, and maximum likelihood estimates of parameters such as branch lengths were used to compare the posterior probabilities of assignments of character states (nucleotides or amino acids) to anterior nodes of the tree; the assignment having the highest probability was the best reconstruction at the site. The lysozyme c sequences of six mammals were analyzed by using the likelihood and parsimony methods. The new likelihood-based method was found to be superior to the parsimony method. The probability that the amino acids for all interior nodes at a site reconstructed by the new method are correct was calculated to be 0.91, 0.86, and 0.73 for all, variable, and parsimony method were 0.84, 0.76, and 0.51, respectively. The probability that an amino acid in an ancestral sequence is correctly reconstructed by the likelihood analysis ranged from 91.3 to 98.7% for the four ancestral sequences.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods

36496Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood

10109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution

3946Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, Z., Kumar, S., & Nei, M. (1995). A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences. Genetics, 141(4), 1641–1650. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/141.4.1641

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 197

60%

Researcher 72

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 49

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 203

62%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 92

28%

Computer Science 20

6%

Environmental Science 14

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free