Limits on the storage of quantum information in a volume of space

24Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study the fundamental limits on the reliable storage of quantum information in lattices of qubits by deriving tradeoff bounds for approximate quantum error correcting codes. We introduce a notion of local approximate correctability and code distance, and give a number of equivalent formulations thereof, generalizing various exact error-correction criteria. Our tradeoff bounds relate the number of physical qubits n, the number of encoded qubits k, the code distance d, the accuracy parameter ℓ'that quantifies how well the erasure channel can be reversed, and the locality parameter ℓ that specifies the length scale at which the recovery operation can be done. In a regime where the recovery is successful to accuracy δ that is exponentially small in ℓ, which is the case for perturbations of local commuting projector codes, our bound reads kd 2 D-1 ≤ O ( n(log n) 2D D-1 ) for codes on D-dimensional lattices of Euclidean metric. We also find that the code distance of any local approximate code cannot exceed O ( ℓn(D-1)=D ) if δ≤O(ℓn-1=D). As a corollary of our formulation of correctability in terms of logical operator avoidance, we show that the code distance d and the size ∼ d of a minimal region that can support all approximate logical operators satisfies dd 1 D-1 ≤ O ( nℓ D D-1 ) , where the logical operators are accurate up to O ( (nδ=d)1=2 ) in operator norm. Finally, we prove that for two-dimensional systems if logical operators can be approximated by operators supported on constant-width exible strings, then the dimension of the code space must be bounded. This supports one of the assumptions of algebraic anyon theories, that there exist only finitely many anyon types.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flammia, S. T., Haah, J., Kastoryano, M. J., & Kim, I. H. (2017). Limits on the storage of quantum information in a volume of space. Quantum, 1. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2017-04-25-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free