Acute copper and cupric ion toxicity in an estuarine microbial community

67Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Copper was acutely toxic to the estuarine microbial community of Middle Marshes, N.C. Under ambient water quality conditions, 10,μg of added total copper [Cu(II)] liter-1 reduced the CFU bacterial abundance by up to 60% and inhibited the amino acid turnover rate (AATR) by as much as 30%. Copper toxicity, however, was a quantitative function of free cupric ion (Cu2+) activity that was not directly related to Cu(II) or ligand-bound copper. By using a nitrilotriacetic acid-cupric ion buffer to control pCu (-log Cu2+ activity), it was found that an in situ pCu of 10.1 was bactericidal, reducing the CFU by 60%, but inhibited the AATR by only about 10%. A bacterial bioassay that was used to estimate the pCu in Cu(II)-treated Middle Marshes samples indicated that less than 0.5% of added Cu(II) was in the free cupric ion form. CFU was a more sensitive indicator of low-level copper stress than was AATR. When tested at different times, native microbial community responses to acute cupric ion stress were quantitatively quite similar even when there were large differences in bacterial abundances and in situ metabolic rates. Variations were observed in response to Cu(II) treatments at different times, but these were likely due to differences in water quality, which would quantitatively influence the distribution of copper complexes that were present. Asymptotic response curves suggest that some degree of copper resistance exists in this community. At a pCu of 8, more than 2 orders of magnitude above the minimum inhibitory level, the CFU was still 5 to 10% and the AATR was about 3% of the control values. © 1989, American Society for Microbiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jonas, R. B. (1989). Acute copper and cupric ion toxicity in an estuarine microbial community. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.55.1.43-49.1989

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free