Do Mass Nouns Constitute a Semantically Uniform Class?

  • Nicolas D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research on mass nouns has focused on concrete terms. So, are there semantic properties shared by all mass terms? We first consider concrete nouns like milk and furniture. Contra Cheng (1973), we show that they can be held to refer distributively (i.e. to apply to any part of what they apply to) only if this property is understood with a new part-relation, that of N-part . In addition, they r efer cumulatively: when they apply to each of two things, they also apply to the two things considered together. We then turn to abstract mass terms like beauty and love. We find, surprisingly, that they too refer distributively and cumulatively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicolas, D. (2015). Do Mass Nouns Constitute a Semantically Uniform Class? Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.17161/kwpl.1808.591

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free