Practical Imagination

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter presents the concept of practical imagination as a specification of the general concept of imagination. This type of imagination participates in the representation and anticipation of possible scenarios in which we see ourselves performing a course of action and living its consequences; it is from this anticipation that we make our decisions and act. By virtue of this, practical imagination is mainly counterfactual, and its exercise is limited to the field of the possible and realizable. The internal relationship between practical rationality and imagination allows us, in turn, to differentiate the latter into the four practical contexts in which practical rationality can be differentiated, so that we can speak of ethical, moral, political and legal imagination. These four forms of imagination are developed as enablers of ethical, moral, legal and political rationality. This will be illustrated through the contributions of classical thinkers such as Aristotle and the Stoics in the case of ethical imagination, Hume and Kant for moral imagination, whereas the anticipation of institutional and legal arrangements that articulate our political and legal imagination will be presented from a wide variety of contributions that range from Plato to Marx.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pereira, G. (2019). Practical Imagination. In Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations (Vol. 9, pp. 7–32). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26520-5_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free