On the decision trees with symmetries

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We introduce a propositional proof system based on decision trees utilizing symmetries of formulas. We refer to this proof system as decision trees with symmetries (SDT). SDT can be polynomially simulated by the proof system SR-I introduced by Krishnamurthy [7]; SR-I extends Resolution with the symmetry rule. We show that there are polynomial-size proofs of the functional pigeonhole principle ([Formula Present]) and of an encoding of the clique coloring principle (CLIQUE-COLORINGn,k). On the other hand we show that any SDT for the pigeonhole principle ([Formula Present]) has size [Formula Present] despite that [Formula Present] has a lot of symmetries. In 1999 Urquhart [11] showed that [Formula Present] has a polynomial-size SR-I refutation. Thus SDT is strictly weaker than SR-I. The smallest decision tree for [Formula Present] has size 2Ω(n log n); we show that there exists an SDT for [Formula Present] of size [Formula Present].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Riazanov, A. (2018). On the decision trees with symmetries. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10846 LNCS, pp. 282–294). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90530-3_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free