Epilogue: The Epistemic and Practical Circle in an Evolutionary, Ecologically Sustainable Society

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a context of human demographic, technological and economic pressure on natural systems, we face some demanding challenges. We must decide 1) whether to “preserve” nature for its own sake or to “conserve” nature because nature is essentially a reservoir of goods that are functional to humanity’s well-being; 2) to choose ways of life that respect the biodiversity and evolutionary potential of the planet; and, to allow all this to come to fruition, 3) to clearly define the role of scientific expertise in a democratic society, recognizing the importance of biospheric equilibrium. In fact, in socio-scientific controversies, which are characterized by complex linkages between some life and environmental sciences objects and economic, political and ethical issues, a posture of transparent, impartial commitment is appearing, more and more, as a deontological necessity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergandi, D. (2013). Epilogue: The Epistemic and Practical Circle in an Evolutionary, Ecologically Sustainable Society. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 296, pp. 151–158). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5067-8_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free