The price premium of China A-shares over Hong Kong H-shares: A further visit of the liquidity hypothesis

18Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I examine the price premium between A-shares and H-shares using a sample of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Shanghai stock market intraday data in 2004. Following the market- microstructure approach, I reinvestigate the liquidity hypothesis by incorporating spread and depth. The study generates two important results. First, China A-shares on average provide better market liquidity than their Hong Kong H-share counterparts do. Second, after controlling for traditional liquidity measures and variables related to competing hypotheses, the percentage differences in quoted spread and depth between Ashares and H-shares still explain significantly the price premium. Endogeneity between spread and depth does not affect the major findings.

References Powered by Scopus

Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread

2503Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Equity ownership concentration and firm value. Evidence from private equity financings

497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Liquidity, Maturity, and the Yields on U.S. Treasury Securities

314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The impact of religious certification on market segmentation and investor recognition

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dark side of institutional shareholder activism in emerging markets: Evidence from China's split share structure reform

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Selection and institutional shareholder activism in Chinese acquisitions

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, H. W. (2009). The price premium of China A-shares over Hong Kong H-shares: A further visit of the liquidity hypothesis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 38(5), 657–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6156.2009.tb00026.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 4

57%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

29%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free