Applying an Extended UTAUT2 Model to Explain User Acceptance of Lifestyle and Therapy Mobile Health Apps: Survey Study

60Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) care apps are a promising technology to monitor and control health individually and cost-effectively with a technology that is widely used, affordable, and ubiquitous in many people's lives. Download statistics show that lifestyle apps are widely used by young and healthy users to improve fitness, nutrition, and more. While this is an important aspect for the prevention of future chronic diseases, the burdened health care systems worldwide may directly profit from the use of therapy apps by those patients already in need of medical treatment and monitoring. Objective: We aimed to compare the factors influencing the acceptance of lifestyle and therapy apps to better understand what drives and hinders the use of mHealth apps. Methods: We applied the established unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2) technology acceptance model to evaluate mHealth apps via an online questionnaire with 707 German participants. Moreover, trust and privacy concerns were added to the model and, in a between-subject study design, the influence of these predictors on behavioral intention to use apps was compared between lifestyle and therapy apps. Results: The results show that the model only weakly predicted the intention to use mHealth apps (R2=0.019). Only hedonic motivation was a significant predictor of behavioral intentions regarding both app types, as determined by path coefficients of the model (lifestyle: 0.196, P=.004; therapy: 0.344, P .001), and the propensity to trust apps (r=0.191, P>.001) correlated weakly with behavioral intention to use mHealth apps. Conclusions: The results indicate that, rather than by utilitarian factors like usefulness, mHealth app acceptance is influenced by emotional factors like hedonic motivation and partly by habit, social influence, and trust. Overall, the findings give evidence that for the health care context, new and extended acceptance models need to be developed with an integration of user diversity, especially individuals' prior experience with apps and mHealth.

References Powered by Scopus

Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology

39668Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view

27290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

9497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Patient Acceptance of Prescribed and Fully Reimbursed mHealth Apps in Germany: An UTAUT2-based Online Survey Study

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fitness Apps's purchase behaviour: Amalgamation of Stimulus-Organism-Behaviour-Consequence framework (S–O–B–C) and the innovation resistance theory (IRT)

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors influencing the acceptance of telemedicine in the Philippines

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schomakers, E. M., Lidynia, C., Vervier, L. S., Valdez, A. C., & Ziefle, M. (2022). Applying an Extended UTAUT2 Model to Explain User Acceptance of Lifestyle and Therapy Mobile Health Apps: Survey Study. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/26453

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

24%

Researcher 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

53%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

26%

Social Sciences 3

16%

Environmental Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free