Abstract The following paper argues that Blaise Pascal, in spite of his famous opposition between the God of the Philosophers and the God of "Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" has significant affinities with the tradition of Renaissance Platonism and is in fact a Platonist in his overall outlook. This is shown in three ways. Firstly, it is argued that Pascal's skeptical fideism has roots in the notion of faith developed in post-Plotinian neo-Platonism. Secondly, it is argued that Pascal makes considerable use of the Platonic notion of an indefinite dyadic principle. Thirdly, it is argued that Pascal's religious psychology gives a centrality to the body that brings it close to the theurgical standpoint of figures like Iamblichus. Pascal is then contrasted to figures like Cusanus and Pico in that a dyadic principle of opposition is more prominent in his work than a triadic logic of mediation. © 2012 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.
CITATION STYLE
Wills, B. (2012). Pascal and the persistence of platonism in early modern thought. International Journal of Platonic Tradition, 6(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1163/18725473-12341236
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.