Pascal and the persistence of platonism in early modern thought

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract The following paper argues that Blaise Pascal, in spite of his famous opposition between the God of the Philosophers and the God of "Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" has significant affinities with the tradition of Renaissance Platonism and is in fact a Platonist in his overall outlook. This is shown in three ways. Firstly, it is argued that Pascal's skeptical fideism has roots in the notion of faith developed in post-Plotinian neo-Platonism. Secondly, it is argued that Pascal makes considerable use of the Platonic notion of an indefinite dyadic principle. Thirdly, it is argued that Pascal's religious psychology gives a centrality to the body that brings it close to the theurgical standpoint of figures like Iamblichus. Pascal is then contrasted to figures like Cusanus and Pico in that a dyadic principle of opposition is more prominent in his work than a triadic logic of mediation. © 2012 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wills, B. (2012). Pascal and the persistence of platonism in early modern thought. International Journal of Platonic Tradition, 6(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1163/18725473-12341236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free