Who Should Apologize When an Employee Transgresses? Source Effects on Apology Effectiveness

24Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper examines the interactive effects of apology source (i.e., whether an apology is given by a chief executive officer or employee) and apology components (i.e., acknowledgment, remorse, and compensation) on forgiveness. Results revealed a significant source by component interaction. A remorseful employee apology was more successful than a remorseful CEO apology because consumers felt more empathy for the employee. Furthermore, a compensatory CEO apology was more effective than a compensatory employee apology because CEOs could significantly affect consumer perceptions of justice. No significant differences were found between apology source and the apology component of acknowledging violated rules and norms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hill, K. M., & Boyd, D. P. (2015). Who Should Apologize When an Employee Transgresses? Source Effects on Apology Effectiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2205-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free