Equivalence and noninferiority trials - Are they viable alternatives for registration of new drugs? (III)

27Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The scientific community's reliance on active-controlled trials is steadily increasing, as widespread agreement emerges concerning the role of these trials as viable alternatives to placebo trials. These trials present substantial challenges with regard to design and interpretation as their complexity increases, and the potential need for larger sample sizes impacts the cost and time variables of the drug development process. The potential efficacy and safety benefits derived from these trials may never be demonstrated by other methods. Active-controlled trials can develop valuable data to inform both prescribers and patients about the dose- and time-dependent actions of any new drug and can contribute to the management and communication of risks associated with the relevant therapeutic products. © 2004 Pater; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pater, C. (2004, August 17). Equivalence and noninferiority trials - Are they viable alternatives for registration of new drugs? (III). Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-5-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free