Using improved varieties and fertility enhancements for increasing yield of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown by small-landholder farmers in Uganda

  • Gerald S
  • Robert M
  • Michael U
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Productivity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Uganda is less than 30% of the yield of improved varieties grown on research stations. This yield gap has been attributed mainly to low soil fertility and susceptibility of local varieties saved by farmers to pest and disease infestations. This study evaluated the impact of four improved varieties and soil fertility improvement on bean yields on small-landholder farms in three agro-ecological zones in Uganda. Yields of common bean on-farm without fertilization were on average 523 kg/ha. Enhancing soil fertility on-farm with cattle manure (10 t/ha), P (60 kg/ha), or manure (5 t/ha) + P (30 kg/ha) led to average yields of 631, 615, and 659 kg/ha, respectively. On average, improved varieties produced more yield than the local farmer-saved variety, with or without soil fertility improvement. Improved variety K131 yielded 807 kg/ha, on average, in response to manure application, which was 54% greater than the yield of the local variety. P intensification up to 180 kg/ha per season, however, did not increase bean yields significantly at any of three research stations. These results confirm the yield advantage of growing improved varieties on small-landholder farms. The combination of improved genetics and fertility intensification alone, however, did not eliminate the yield gap between on-farm and potential bean yields.

Figures

  • Table 1. Characteristics of six common beans varieties grown in Uganda. Information compiled from the NASECO Seed Company, Kampala, and the National Crops Resources Research Institute, Namulonge, Uganda.
  • Table 2. Characteristics of soils sampled from trials sites in Bugulumbya, Butansi, Nakabango, Namulonge, and Mbarara, Uganda. The values are averages of samples taken at each location.
  • Table 3. Average yield, yield components, and harvested plant populations for five common bean varieties evaluated in on-farm trials. Data are pooled for three growing seasons and 60 locations in 2009 and 2010.
  • Table 4. Yield and yield component responses of common bean varieties K131, K132, NABE4, NABE6, Kanyebwa to 10T/ha manure applied at planting. Data are the mean of 12 locations pooled for two growing seasons in 2009.
  • Table 5. Response of yield and yield components of three common bean varieties to phosphorus (60 kg/ha), manure (10 t/ha) and phosphorus (30 kg/ha) + manure (5 t/ha) fertilizer treatments. Data are the mean of 22 locations pooled for three seasons in 2010 and 2011.
  • Table 6. Effect of phosphorus intensification on the Yield (kg/ha) of two common bean varieties grown in three agro-ecological zones (Nakabango, Namulonge, Mbarara) in Uganda.
  • Table 7. Yield components, harvest index (HI), and harvest population as affected by intensive phosphorus applications. Values are means for NABE4 and Kanyebwa varieties grown for three3 seasons at Nakabango and Namulonge, and for two seasons for Mbarara, Uganda.
  • Table 8. Estimate of phosphorus fixing capacity by soils at the Nakabango, Namulonge, and Mbarara trial sites.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gerald, S., Robert, M., Michael, U., & Mark, W. (2015). Using improved varieties and fertility enhancements for increasing yield of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown by small-landholder farmers in Uganda. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(52), 4795–4805. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar2015.9638

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

78%

Researcher 5

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14

56%

Environmental Science 6

24%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

12%

Psychology 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0