Which patients are not suitable for a subcutaneous ICD: Incidence and predictors of failed QRS-T-wave morphology screening

110Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

T-Wave Analysis for the Subcutaneous ICD Background The subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) relies on a pre-implantation QRS-T morphology screening (TMS) of the ECG to assure that it reliably detects the QRS complexes and T waves. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of the patients who fail this TMS is unknown. Methods and Results QRS-TMS was done in 230 consecutive ICD outpatients (75% male, age 57 ± 15 years) without an indication for cardiac pacing, using an ECG simulating the 3 sensing vectors of the S-ICD (TMS-ECG). Patients were defined suitable when at least 1 sensing vector was considered appropriate in both supine and standing position. In total, 7.4% of patients, who were all male, were considered not suitable for a S-ICD according to the TMS-ECG. Independent predictors for TMS failure were hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM; odds ratio [OR] 12.6), a heavy weight (OR 1.5), a prolonged QRS duration (OR 1.5) and a R:T ratio <3 in the lead with the largest T wave on a standard 12-lead surface ECG (OR 14.6). Conclusion In patients without an indication for pacing, 7.4% would have been not suitable for a S-ICD according to the TMS. HCM, a heavy weight, a prolonged QRS duration and a R:T ratio <3 in the ECG lead with the largest T wave were independently associated with TMS failure. These data might alert physicians that selection of patients for a S-ICD should be considered with special caution in certain patient groups, because they may not satisfy ECG criteria for adequate sensing. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olde Nordkamp, L. R. A., Warnaars, J. L. F., Kooiman, K. M., De Groot, J. R., Rosenmöller, B. R. A. M., Wilde, A. A. M., & Knops, R. E. (2014). Which patients are not suitable for a subcutaneous ICD: Incidence and predictors of failed QRS-T-wave morphology screening. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 25(5), 494–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12343

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free