Following publication of the original article [1], the authors discovered that some pie charts had been misplaced in the tree of Fig. 2a, and in the trees of supplementary figures S16, S22, S24 (Additional file 3) due to incorrect visualization of the output of ASTRAL [2]. These quartet support values are, however, correctly provided in supplementary tables S16–S19 of the original publication. Thus, the original publication is inconsistent on a couple of support values for specific phylogenetic relationships. We provide now a corrected Fig. 2 and an updated Additional file 3 with corrected Figures S16, S22, S24. The changes in Fig. 2a do not affect the controversial branches discussed in the original publication (e.g. relationships within Osmyloidea, phylogenetic affinities of Chrysopidae and Hemerobiidae, monophyly of Myrmeleontiformia and Myrmeleontidae). The corrected Fig. 2a shows the correct (increased) quartet support for the monophyly of Neuropterida (q1 = 0.798, q2 = 0.098, q3 = 0.103) and the correct (lower) quartet support for the monophyly of Neuroptera (q1 = 0.476, q2 = 0.168, q3 = 0.357). Quartet support for the monophyly of Neuroptera (q1) is still higher in comparison to the other two topologies (q2, q3) around this specific internode. Therefore these changes do not alter the conclusions of [1]. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.
CITATION STYLE
Vasilikopoulos, A., Misof, B., Meusemann, K., Lieberz, D., Flouri, T., Beutel, R. G., … Aspöck, U. (2020, December 1). Correction to: An integrative phylogenomic approach to elucidate the evolutionary history and divergence times of Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola) (BMC Evolutionary Biology, (2020), 20, 1, (64), 10.1186/s12862-020-01631-6). BMC Evolutionary Biology. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01695-4
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.