A whole-genome analysis using robust asymmetric distributions.

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study is aimed at improving the analysis of data used in identifying marker-associated effects on quantitative traits, specifically to account for possible departures from a Gaussian distribution of the trait data and to allow for asymmetry of marker effects attributable to phenotypic divergence between parental lines. A Bayesian procedure for analysing marker effects at the whole-genome level is presented. The procedure adopts a skewed t-distribution as a prior distribution of marker effects. The model with the skewed t-process includes Gaussian prior distributions, skewed Gaussian prior distributions and symmetric t-distributions as special cases. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm for obtaining marginal posterior distributions of the unknowns is also presented. The method was applied to a dataset on three traits (live weight, carcass length and backfat depth) measured in an F2 cross between Iberian and Landrace pigs. The distribution of marker effects was clearly asymmetric for carcass length and backfat depth, whereas it was symmetric for live weight. The t-distribution seems more appropriate for describing the distribution of marker effects on backfat depth.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Bayesian LASSO for quantitative trait loci mapping

226Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prediction of complex traits: Robust alternatives to best linear unbiased prediction

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Skew distribution of founder-specific inbreeding depression effects on the longevity of Landrace sows

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varona, L., Mekkawy, W., Gianola, D., & Blasco, A. (2006). A whole-genome analysis using robust asymmetric distributions. Genetical Research, 88(3), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672307008488

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Researcher 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

89%

Chemical Engineering 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free