Environmental cooperation: Ratifying second-best agreements

9Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As an alternative to the environmental cartel approach, we assume that an international environmental agreement aims simply at providing a collective response to a perceived threat. Given this less demanding concept of cooperation and considering that most treaties become enforceable only after ratification by a sufficient number of participants, we examine the set of self-enforceable agreements. This set contains first-best but also second-best agreements that do not maximize the collective welfare of members but meet environmental and/or participative requirements. We study the properties of this set and discuss admissible values of targets and thresholds that favour economics over environmental objectives and vice versa. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Courtois, P., & Haeringer, G. (2012). Environmental cooperation: Ratifying second-best agreements. Public Choice, 151(3–4), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9759-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free