Oncology Modeling for Fun and Profit! Key Steps for Busy Analysts in Health Technology Assessment

10Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In evaluating new oncology medicines, two common modeling approaches are state transition (e.g., Markov and semi-Markov) and partitioned survival. Partitioned survival models have become more prominent in oncology health technology assessment processes in recent years. Our experience in conducting and evaluating models for economic evaluation has highlighted many important and practical pitfalls. As there is little guidance available on best practices for those who wish to conduct them, we provide guidance in the form of ‘Key steps for busy analysts,’ who may have very little time and require highly favorable results. Our guidance highlights the continued need for rigorous conduct and transparent reporting of economic evaluations regardless of the modeling approach taken, and the importance of modeling that better reflects reality, which includes better approaches to considering plausibility, estimating relative treatment effects, dealing with post-progression effects, and appropriate characterization of the uncertainty from modeling itself.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beca, J., Husereau, D., Chan, K. K. W., Hawkins, N., & Hoch, J. S. (2018). Oncology Modeling for Fun and Profit! Key Steps for Busy Analysts in Health Technology Assessment. PharmacoEconomics, 36(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0583-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free