Validity of the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy self-check sheet

6Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting side effect of some anti-cancer drugs. However, medical staff frequently encounter difficulties in ascertaining the severity of CIPN. We sought to develop a questionnaire in order to accurately assess CIPN. The validity of this questionnaire was compared with that of free-style interviews. Methods We developed the CIPN self-check sheet by analyzing existing self-assessment tools for CIPN and matching the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grades. From August to December 2011, 77 cancer patients participated in this study. In order to evaluate the validity of the CIPN self-check sheet compared with a free-style interview assessment, the cross-classification and κ coefficients between the CTCAE grades from each assessment and those from a comprehensive assessment were analyzed. The comprehensive assessment utilized information obtained from the medical examination, free-style interview and CIPN self-check sheet. Results Upon completion of the study, 248 CIPN self-check sheets were collected (median number of sheets per patient, 3; range, 1-14). The cross-classification analysis illustrated that the CIPN self-check sheet successfully identified all grade 3 cases. The coefficient of the CIPN self-check sheet was significantly higher than that of the free-style interviews [κ values: 0.988 (p<0.01) and 0.501 (p<0.01) for the self-check sheet and interviews, respectively]. Conclusion The CIPN self-check sheet can be used to assess the severity of CIPN based on the CTCAE grade more accurately than free-style interviews.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miyoshi, Y., Onishi, C., Fujie, M., Senoo, N., Wakatsuki, R., & Suzumiya, J. (2015). Validity of the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy self-check sheet. Internal Medicine, 54(7), 737–742. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.54.3318

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free