Social Welfare Attitudes and Immigrants as a Target Population: Experimental Evidence

6Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

What makes some Americans assume that social welfare programs will benefit immigrants rather than native-born Americans? How do these assumptions shape their attitudes about policy? Recent observational research has shown that immigration attitudes and social welfare attitudes are strongly correlated, but we lack evidence of exactly how this relationship works. In this pre-registered survey experiment, I study respondents' assumptions about beneficiaries of a generic social welfare policy, and test the effects of different threat primes on the assumption that the policy benefits immigrants rather than native-born Americans. I find that a prime constructing immigrants as a fiscal threat increases the likelihood that a respondent will make this assumption, while a prime emphasizing cultural or demographic threat has no significant effect. These effects vary by geographic context, but not by relevant attitudes. Attitudes about immigration become an important predictor of policy approval when this assumption is triggered. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haselswerdt, J. (2021). Social Welfare Attitudes and Immigrants as a Target Population: Experimental Evidence. Perspectives on Politics, 19(2), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720002406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free