Understanding the relationship between social capital, health, and well-being in a southern rural population

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Social capital is thought to contribute to health and well-being, but its application to a rural context is poorly understood. This study seeks to examine how different forms of social capital relate to health and well-being among rural residents and the extent to which race and degree of rurality moderates these relationships. Methods: Data from a population-based survey of 6 counties in rural Georgia (n = 1,385) are used. We examined 3 forms of social capital (diversity of interaction, civic engagement, and voting behavior) in relation to 3 health and well-being measures (overall life satisfaction, general health status, and 30-day physical health). Findings: Interacting with more diverse social networks was associated with higher overall life satisfaction for White but not Black participants (P ≤.001). For those living in more rural communities, interacting with a more diverse social network was more strongly associated with greater general health as compared to those who lived “in town” (P ≤.01). Greater civic engagement and voting behavior were associated with greater general health for White but not Black participants (Ps

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arriola, K. J., Merken, T. M., Bigger, L., Haardörfer, R., Hermstad, A., Owolabi, S., … Kegler, M. (2024). Understanding the relationship between social capital, health, and well-being in a southern rural population. Journal of Rural Health, 40(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12782

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free