Neither Weak, Nor Strong? Emergence and Functional Reduction

6Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The clarification of the concept of emergence has long been on the agenda of the metaphysics of science; notions such as ‘irreducibility’, ‘novelty’ and ‘unpredictability’ have been invoked in an attempt to better circumscribe this notoriously elusive idea. This paper joins this effort, by examining a class of familiar physical processes, such as boiling and freezing—generically called ‘phase transitions’—since many philosophers and physicists take them to be good candidates of emergent phenomena. While I am broadly sympathetic to this view, in this paper I ask what kind of emergence they instantiate. I am asking this question because I would like to argue that the two kinds of emergence currently identified in the metaphysics literature, ‘weak’ and ‘strong’, do not adequately characterize these phenomena.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bangu, S. (2015). Neither Weak, Nor Strong? Emergence and Functional Reduction. In Frontiers Collection (Vol. Part F973, pp. 153–166). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43911-1_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free