Molecular method for detection of total coliforms in drinking water samples

43Citations
Citations of this article
199Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This work demonstrates the ability of a bacterial concentration and recovery procedure combined with three different PCR assays targeting the lacZ, wecG, and 16S rRNA genes, respectively, to detect the presence of total coliforms in 100-ml samples of potable water (presence/absence test). PCR assays were first compared to the culture-based Colilert and MI agar methods to determine their ability to detect 147 coliform strains representing 76 species of Enterobacteriaceae encountered in fecal and environmental settings. Results showed that 86 (58.5%) and 109 (74.1%) strains yielded a positive signal with Colilert and MI agar methods, respectively, whereas the lacZ, wecG, and 16S rRNA PCR assays detected 133 (90.5%), 111 (75.5%), and 146 (99.3%) of the 147 total coliform strains tested. These assays were then assessed by testing 122 well water samples collected in the Québec City region of Canada. Results showed that 97 (79.5%) of the samples tested by culture-based methods and 95 (77.9%), 82 (67.2%), and 98 (80.3%) of samples tested using PCR-based methods contained total coliforms, respectively. Consequently, despite the high genetic variability of the total coliform group, this study demonstrated that it is possible to use molecular assays to detect total coliforms in potable water: the 16S rRNA molecular assay was shown to be as efficient as recommended culturebased methods. This assay might be used in combination with an Escherichia coli molecular assay to assess drinking water quality. © 2014, American Society for Microbiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maheux, A. F., Boudreau, D. K., Bisson, M. A., Dion-Dupont, V., Bouchard, S., Nkuranga, M., … Rodriguez, M. J. (2014). Molecular method for detection of total coliforms in drinking water samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 80(14), 4074–4084. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00546-14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free