Evaluation of healthy equine eyes by use of retinoscopy, keratometry, and ultrasonographic biometry

38Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To assess natural variations in degree of refraction, corneal curvature, corneal astigmatism, corneal radius, and intraocular distance of healthy equine eyes. Animals - 159 horses with healthy eyes that were admitted to a veterinary teaching hospital for nonophthalmic surgeries. Procedures - Eyes of horses were examined with a retinoscope prior to anesthesia and with a keratograph and A- and B-scan ultrasonographic biometers during surgery. In addition, manual caliper measurements of horizontal and vertical corneal radii were obtained. Results - Mean ± SD degree of refraction in the horizontal meridian of eyes was -0.06 ± 0.68 diopters (D). Vitreous body length and horse age correlated negatively with refraction values. The horizontal corneal radius (15.96 ± 1.28 mm) was larger than the vertical corneal radius (15.02 ± 1.09 mm). Accordingly, the vertical corneal curvature (21.56 ± 1.68 D) was greater than the horizontal corneal curvature (22.89 ± 1.65 D). Axial globe length (40.52 ± 2.67 mm), anterior chamber depth (6.35 ± 0.59 mm), lens thickness (12.30 ± 0.83 mm), and vitreous body length (21.87 ± 1.85 mm) were positively correlated with body weight, height, and age. Results of keratograph and caliper measurements correlated well for horizontal corneal diameter but poorly for vertical corneal diameter. Results of A- and B-scan ultrasonography differed by ≤ 1 mm in 64% of measured eyes. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - Results of keratometry and ultrasonographic biometry varied widely. Additional research is needed to validate the keratograph used in our study for measurements in equine eyes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grinninger, P., Skalicky, M., & Nell, B. (2010). Evaluation of healthy equine eyes by use of retinoscopy, keratometry, and ultrasonographic biometry. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 71(6), 677–681. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.71.6.677

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free