Exploring subjective wellbeing after birth: A qualitative deductive descriptive study

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Subjective wellbeing is made up of cognitive (life satisfaction and positive functioning) and emotional (positive and negative affect) components. The subjective wellbeing of women in the perinatal period is poorly understood compared to that experienced by the general population. The aim of this paper is to describe women’s experiences of subjective wellbeing postpartum using the European Social Survey Wellbeing module to facilitate discussion. METHODS Nineteen women aged 18−40 years who had given birth within the past 6 months participated in two focus groups (n=9 and n=10). Participants in the focus groups were invited to complete the European Social Survey Wellbeing module and this was used as the basis for discussion. RESULTS Women recognized that many aspects of their wellbeing were compromised after having a baby, e.g. vitality and positive functioning. Women reported that the time after birth was often challenging in terms of feeling good about themselves. Women were often tired and did not always trust their own abilities as a parent. Woman reported feeling socially isolated after giving birth and highlighted the importance of their relationships in terms of feeling valued. Changes in relationships were a source of stress and conflict. Many women reported that they did not feel engaged with their local community. CONCLUSIONS Women perceive their subjective wellbeing to be different after birth. A better understanding of the aspects of wellbeing that may be challenged after birth could facilitate provision of tailored support for women and their family to maximize their continued good health and wellbeing.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alderdice, F., & Gargan, P. (2019). Exploring subjective wellbeing after birth: A qualitative deductive descriptive study. European Journal of Midwifery, 3(March). https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/104679

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free