Use of a distraction-to-stall lengthening procedure in magnetically controlled growing rods: A single-center cohort study

20Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) using a standardized distraction procedure with intended distraction-to-stall and to compare the outcomes between idiopathic and nonidiopathic patients. Methods: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study. Conversion cases were excluded. Distractions were performed with 2-to 3-month intervals with the intention of distraction-to-stall on both rods. Distraction length was measured on X-rays every 6 months. Spinal height was assessed using T1-T12 and T1-S1 annual increase. Results: 19 patients (eight idiopathic and 11 nonidiopathic) were included. Mean age at surgery was 9.7 ± 1.9 years, and median follow-up was 1.9 years (interquartile range (IQR): 1.3–2.2). Major curve improved from median 76° (IQR: 64–83) preoperatively to 42° (IQR: 32–51) postoperatively (p < 0.001) corresponding to a curve correction of 43% (IQR: 33–51). Correction was maintained at 1-and 2-year follow-up. Median annual T1-T12 and T1-S1 height increase were 10 mm (IQR: 6–16) and 11 mm (IQR: 7–33), respectively. A total of 159 distraction procedures were performed; 83.5% of these were distracted-to-stall, and 16.5% were stopped due to discomfort. Median rod distraction per procedure was 2.0 mm (IQR: 1.6–2.7) for the concave side and 1.7 mm (IQR: 1.4–2.5) for the convex side. Five patients had implant-related complications. Patients with nonidiopathic etiology were significantly younger and had lower flexibility compared with idiopathic patients (p = 0.040). However, we found no statistically significant difference in curve correction, spinal height increase, distraction length, or complications between the two groups (p = 0.109). Conclusion: MCGR effectively corrected the deformity and increased spinal height using a distraction procedure with intended distraction-to-stall. Five of 19 patients had implant-related complications, and we found no difference in the outcomes between idiopathic and nonidiopathic patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dahl, B., Dragsted, C., Ohrt-Nissen, S., Andersen, T., & Gehrchen, M. (2018). Use of a distraction-to-stall lengthening procedure in magnetically controlled growing rods: A single-center cohort study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018779833

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free