The paper is a discussion of a result of Hubert and Bernays in their Grundlagen der Mathematik. Their interpretation of the result is similar to the standard intepretation of Tarski's Theorem. This and other interpretations are discussed and shown to be inadequate. Instead, it is argued, the result refutes certain versions of Meinongianism. In addition, it poses new problems for classical logic that are solved by dialetheism.
CITATION STYLE
Priest, G. (1997). On a paradox of Hubert and Bernays. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 26(1), 55–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017900703234
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.