Biological scaffolds for abdominal wall repair: Future in clinical application?

40Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Millions of abdominal wall repair procedures are performed each year for primary and incisional hernias both in the European Union and in the United States with extremely high costs. Synthetic meshes approved for augmenting abdominal wall repair provide adequate mechanical support but have significant drawbacks (seroma formation, adhesion to viscera, stiffness of abdominal wall, and infection). Biologic scaffolds (i.e., derived from naturally occurring materials) represent an alternative to synthetic surgical meshes and are less sensitive to infection. Among biologic scaffolds, extracellular matrix scaffolds promote stem/progenitor cell recruitment in models of tissue remodeling and, in the specific application of abdominal wall repair, have enough mechanical strength to support the repair. However, many concerns remain about the use of these scaffolds in the clinic due to their higher cost of production compared with synthetic meshes, despite having the same recurrence rate. The present review aims to highlight the pros and cons of using biologic scaffolds as surgical devices for abdominal wall repair and present possible improvements to widen their use in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Costa, A., Adamo, S., Gossetti, F., D’Amore, L., Ceci, F., Negro, P., & Bruzzone, P. (2019, August 1). Biological scaffolds for abdominal wall repair: Future in clinical application? Materials. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12152375

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free